|
Movies
We Have Enjoyed Seeing
Harry
Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
Reviewed
by Masako Kanki from Japan
|

Photo
from Masako
Kanki
From
beginning to end, it was faithful to the
book and has most of the remarkable
episodes of the book. I could recognize
the main characters on the screen easily.
Almost all of the characters are like I
thought they would be.
|
|
Director:
Chris Columbus
Type:
Adventure/Fantasy
Actors:
Daniel Radcliffe (Harry)
Rupert Grint (Ron)
Emma Watson (Hermione)
Richard Harris (Dumbledore)
Country/Date:
United Kingdom/2001
The
four Harry Potter books have sold more than 100
million copies and have been translated into 47
languages. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's
Stone is based on the first book in a project
of a seven-book series written by
J.K.Rowlings.
A
fact that will surprise you is the movie has been
so faithful to the book; there aren't additional or
exaggerated scenes. Because the director and the
screenwriter worked in collaboration with the
author, so she could supervise the movie. She could
manage the movie to be faithful to her
book.
Harry
Potter is an 11-year-old orphan boy. His parents,
who were wizards, were killed by a powerful dark
wizard. He has been living with a bullying Muggle
(non magic people) family. Although they have known
he is a wizard, they didn't tell him that. One day
he gets an invitation from Hogwarts (a magic school
for wizards). Eventually he learns he is a child of
wizard parents, and then he decides to enroll in
Hogwarts. He gets away from the Muggle family and
finds his own place there. Now his adventure
begins.
Like
many other viewers, I had read the book and went to
see the movie, excited. While I was watching the
movie, I compared it to the book. From beginning to
end, it was faithful to the book and has most of
the remarkable episodes of the book. I could
recognize the main characters on the screen easily.
Almost all of the characters are like I thought
they would be.
The
world of wizards, especially "Hogwarts "the magic
school and "Diagon Alley" (a town of wizards) are a
mysterious and great spectacle. The enchanted
properties scattered around the magical world have
been portrayed in detail. I watched "Chocolate
Frogs", "Sorcerer's Stone", and the "bewitched
ceiling at the Great Hall of Hogwarts"; the way
that they created these things matched my
expectation.
Although
every scene is very faithful to the book, I don't
feel the story develops naturally and smoothly. In
addition, this movie fails to show us the traits of
characters or underlying relationship between
characters. The filmmaker might have tried to put
together some outstanding episodes of the book, so
that the movie lost vivid and lively character
development. I think this is one of the reasons I
don't feel the movie develops smoothly; besides, it
may puzzle the nonreaders. If you read the book
you'll know that the character development should
be shown to us more vividly; that would help us
understand the plots of the movie.
Despite
this disappointment, I think it is a fantastic
movie. Since I had read the book, it was great fun
for me to compare what I read with what I watched
on the screen. Finishing the book before you go to
the theater is a better way to enjoy "Harry
Potter". Warner Brothers is already preparing for
the next movie, which will be based on the second
book. I'm looking forward to the second one, "Harry
Potter and the Chamber of Secrets".
Return to: Movies
and Books
| Home
Page
|